Warning: file_get_contents(/home/www/settings/mirror_forum_db_enable_sql): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/html/content/Forum/functions.php on line 8
Puerto Ricans are American citizens (usually), but I remember seeing something about some Puerto Rican, "activist" guy a while back, complaining about other Latino "immigrants" and commending ICE actions.
see my edit below. This is probably the guy, he's learned nothing. Leopards are running wild in the hood.
The CBS poll found that 70% of Latinos disapprove of Trump's handling of immigration - well above the national average of 58%.
While Latinos were split evenly on their support for Trump's deportation goals, 63% said they dislike the way he is currently implementing them.
Several Latinos who spoke to the BBC, however, said they supported the immigration raids and framed them as protecting the jobs and livelihoods of legal immigrants and US citizens.
"As a human being, I feel for them. They're poor in their countries," said Sam Negron, the constable in Allentown. "But guess what? I'm poor in mine."
There was a this american life episode on the potential immigration stuff back in early 2024. They interviewed a guy from Puerto Rico (he was apparently legal, but had a real grudge toward people who were coming in under asylum), and he was gleeful about the possibility of gangs of thugs out grabbing people without papers or any questionable status. I'd really love to see a follow up with him now.
Puerto Ricans are American citizens, but I remember seeing or hearing something about some Puerto Rican, "activist" guy a while back, complaining about other Latino "immigrants" and commending ICE actions.
There was a this american life episode on the potential immigration stuff back in early 2024. They interviewed a guy from Puerto Rico (he was apparently legal, but had a real grudge toward people who were coming in under asylum), and he was gleeful about the possibility of gangs of thugs out grabbing people without papers or any questionable status. I'd really love to see a follow up with him now.
While Latinos were split evenly on their support for Trump's deportation goals, 63% said they dislike the way he is currently implementing them.
Several Latinos who spoke to the BBC, however, said they supported the immigration raids and framed them as protecting the jobs and livelihoods of legal immigrants and US citizens.
"As a human being, I feel for them. They're poor in their countries," said Sam Negron, the constable in Allentown. "But guess what? I'm poor in mine."
I feel no sympathy for people that don't get it until it affects them personally. These people were fine with it when it was happening to everyone else. F them.
Paul LePage, a Trump Ally, Says a Family Member Is Being Deported Paul LePage, a former Maine governor and early supporter of President Trump, who is now running for Congress, said during a campaign event this week that his sonâs father-in-law was being wrongfully deported because of his country of origin.
I feel no sympathy for people that don't get it until it affects them personally. These people were fine with it when it was happening to everyone else. F them.
Paul LePage, a Trump Ally, Says a Family Member Is Being Deported Paul LePage, a former Maine governor and early supporter of President Trump, who is now running for Congress, said during a campaign event this week that his sonâs father-in-law was being wrongfully deported because of his country of origin.
A quick 3:30 video discussing how Vivek Ramaswamy made his fortune through a pump-and-dump scheme based on a bargain-basement purchase of an Alzheimer's drug that had already failed 4 clinical trials.
Emails show Herschel Walker solicited hundreds of thousands of dollars for his own business from a billionaire donor, with the donor believing he was giving to Walker's campaign.
When Herschel Walker emailed a representative for billionaire industrialist and longtime family friend Dennis Washington in March 2022, he seemed to be engaging in normal behavior for a political candidate: He was asking for money.
But unbeknownst to Washington and the billionaireâs staff, Walkerâs request was far more out of the ordinary. It was something campaign finance experts are calling âunprecedented,â âstunning,â and âjaw-dropping.â Walker wasnât just asking for donations to his campaign; he was soliciting hundreds of thousands of dollars for his own personal companyâa company that he never disclosed on his financial statements.
Emails obtained by The Daily Beastâand verified as authentic by a person with knowledge of the exchangesâshow that Walker asked Washington to wire $535,200 directly to that undisclosed company, HR Talent, LLC.
And the emails reveal that not only did Washington complete Walkerâs wire requests, he was under the impression that these were, in fact, political contributions.
In the best possible circumstances, legal experts told The Daily Beast, the emails suggest exponential violations of federal fundraising rules; in the worst case, they could be an indication of more serious crimes, such as wire fraud.
But Walkerâwho had been schooled on campaign finance rules since his campaign launched in Aug. 2021, according to a person involved in those conversationsâappears to have dismissed the Washington teamâs concerns that the money may have gone to the wrong place. When a third party informed a Washington Company executive that the money couldnât be used for political purposes, they raised the issue with Walker, asking at one point whether the funds should be redirected to a super PAC supporting his candidacy.
Walker never contributed any of his own money to his campaign, according to Federal Election Commission filings, and itâs unclear what happened to these particular funds. Walker may have ultimately returned the money to Washington, but he did not reroute the money to the super PAC, according to FEC filings and a person with direct knowledge of the events.
....
According to the legal experts who spoke to The Daily Beast for this article, this scheme appears to not just be illegalâit appears to be unparalleled in its audacity and scope. The transactions raise questions about a slew of possible violations. In fact, these experts all said, the scheme was so brazen that it appears to defy explanation, ranking it among the most egregious campaign finance violations in modern history.
Saurav Ghosh, director of federal reform at Campaign Legal Center, called the arrangement âjaw-dropping.â Jordan Libowitz, communications director at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said if Walker âused the campaign to funnel money into his own business, thatâs one of the biggest campaign finance crimes Iâve ever heard of.â Brendan Fischer, a campaign finance lawyer and deputy executive director of Documented, remarked that the exchanges were âstunning and, to my knowledge, without parallel in recent history.â
âCampaign finance laws are designed to prevent massive under-the-table payments like those described here,â Fischer said. âWhile we donât have all the facts, these emails point to highly illegal, potentially even criminal activity.â
Paul S. Ryan, a campaign finance specialist and deputy executive director at the Fundersâ Committee for Civic Participation, said the situation suggests a âcriminal violationâ that is âextraordinary and unprecedented in my 25 years of campaign finance watchdog work.â
âThereâs no legal way that this could have played out,â Ryan said.
....
Federal law prohibits candidates from converting campaign donations to personal use. The law also limits how much money individuals can contribute to a campaign, as well as how much candidates can solicit from donors. Candidates also cannot solicit, accept, or facilitate contributions in the name of another person.
According to legal experts, campaign finance violations become criminal if the violation was âknowing and willfulââessentially, if the person understands the laws.
At the time of the first email, Walker had already been a candidate for half a year, raising millions of dollars along the way. And he was repeatedly coached on fundraising limits and restrictions since the beginning of his campaign, according to a person involved in those conversationsâa fact that is demonstrated in the emails when Walker provides a breakdown of federal donation limits.
Instead of hiring 2 full-time, well-educated staff members for $100k/each...they spend $2M for them to work a few months.
Probably saved the government money. Instead of hiring people on staff who then go into consulting for the government after a couple of years, just cut out the first step. Might even avoid a lot of pension payments.
Isn't that why folks voted for her, because she hired the best speech writers?
She wasn't elected for her first term; she succeeded Cuomo when he resigned. She was elected for her next term by a narrow margin - unusual for a historically Democratic state like NY. Maybe she needed better writers then.
So the real kicker to me...what the f@!% is the point of filing annual statements if they don't mean anything? In particular... Thomas files for years as the 1/3rd owner of a rental property. One year, the asset disappears. Nobody ever looks at the forms and asks the question? What's the point of filing paperwork if nobody ever looks at it? All form...no substance.
Trump doesn't file mandatory candidate financial disclosures....no big deal...
The conversation about government is all wrong. It shouldn't be about big government or small government, it should be about effective and efficient government. The reason the government is such a shit show now is that the people who used to work for the government now consult to it. Instead of making $80k/year and getting a pension, they make $480k/year and buy vacation homes they can work from. The right is all worked up about hiring 88,000 IRS agents... but doesn't seem bothered that so many people don't pay what they owe (as calculated...not a comment on the tax code itself).
We need the US government to be better, yet do everything in our collective power to destroy their competency.
The experiment is coming to an end. It's time to look for someplace a bit more rational and socially oriented. Selfishness and stupidity keep punching holes in the boat that those bailing can't keep up with.
The Right is correct that government is broken, but instead of trying to fix it they keep chipping away to prove their right.
We've known Clarence Thomas had questionable ethics 30 years ago thanks to (in retrospect) one of the bravest people ever to testify to Congress. How can anyone be surprised that after gaining more power his ethics wander to places a Justice shouldn't tread? Not holding him accountable is just one more example that the Right only cares about winning, even if the country dies in the process.
Well said...and neither side gets the bold.
It's all about politics, and less and less about effective governing.